EDU - Sigma Abstract/Grant Reviewer Application Header Image

Sigma Theta Tau International

Abstract/Grant Reviewer Application Form

Please complete ALL of the required information below and click the "Submit Form" button to save your information. Note, the application can be saved and returned to at a later time. You must complete all fields for the required information before the form can be saved.

PERSONAL INFORMATION

Full Name*
Which is your preferred mailing address?*
Have you been an active reviewer with Sigma in the last 12 months?*
Active Reviewer = involvement in abstract and/or grant reviews at least once in the last 12 months
What programs have you reviewed for Sigma?*
Do you want to apply to review grants in addition to abstracts?*
Do you want to apply to review abstracts in addition to grants? *

WORK ADDRESS INFORMATION

Work Address (Do Not Report Workplace Name)*
International Format Required (US - +1)
International Format Required (US - +1)

HOME ADDRESS INFORMATION

Home Address*
International Format Required (US - +1(317)634-8171)

EMAIL ADDRESS

By submitting this form you are giving Sigma permission to contact this person about this application. This email address will not be sold to or shared with other organizations, nor will it be included in any publications by Sigma.


An alternate email address is strongly recommended! Automatic email confirmations and all meeting correspondence will be sent to your main and alternative email addresses. An alternative email address will NEVER be displayed online or on any printed documentation.

CONTACT (SECRETARY / ASSISTANT)

Name
International Format Required (US - +1)

MEMBERSHIP AND EDUCATION

Please note: Your curriculum vitae (CV) may be requested for verification of information provided.

Are you an active member of Sigma?*
What nursing degree(s) have you obtained? (Check all that apply)*
Example: BS, 1973 -- Tufts University, Somerville, MA -- Nutrition

REVIEWER PREFERENCES

You indicated an interest in continuing as an abstract reviewer and applying as a grant reviewer. Please select "Both Abstracts and Grants" regarding your interest as a reviewer. A full application will be required to add the opportunity to add grant reviewer to your application.

You indicated an interest in continuing as a grant reviewer and applying as an abstract reviewer, please select "Both Abstracts and Grants" regarding your interest as a reviewer. A full application will be required to add the opportunity to add abstract reviewer to your application.

Indicate your interest as a reviewer.*
Select all abstract programs, which you feel you are qualified to review; however, a minimum of one program must be selected. Putting down more abstract areas will not mean that you have to complete more reviews.*

GRANT REVIEWER AREAS OF EXPERTISE

Adult Health Options
Clinical Practice Options
Educational Research Options
Family Health Options
Health of Diverse Populations Options
Health Policy Options
Health Related Behaviors Options
Information and Technologies Options
Models and Mechanisms Options
Research Methods Options
Stress and Health Options
Symptom Management Options
Other

REVIEWER QUALIFICATIONS

Use the two lines on the bottom right-hand corner to expand this text field.
Use the two lines on the bottom right-hand corner to expand this text field.
Use the two lines on the bottom right-hand corner to expand this text field.
Use the two lines on the bottom right-hand corner to expand this text field.

Staff Review #1

Applicant indicated interest as an abstract reviewer*
Applicant indicated interest as a grant reviewer.*
Applicant is an eligible Sigma member.*
Applicant is indicates they are a current active reviewer.*
Verify that the applicant has reviewed at least once in the last 12 months
Applicant has at least a master's degree.*
Applicant has at least a doctoral degree.*
Number of peer-reviewed presentations given meets minimum requirements.*
Number of manuscripts and/or book chapters published meets minimum requirements. *
Number of grants received meets minimum requirements.*
Number of abstract reviewed meets minimum requirements.*
Number of manuscripts and/or book chapters reviewed meets minimum requirements.*
Number of grants reviewed meets minimum requirements.*
Applicant meets all minimum requirements for an abstract reviewer.*
Applicant meets all minimum requirements for a grant reviewer.*
Applicant can be auto-accepted or auto-rejected for ALL applied for.*
Application requires further review.*

Ensure that either auto-acceptance/rejection is selected yes or that further review is selected yes to proceed on to RSAC review. 

N/A is for current active reviewers that have not provided detailed information on application.

Sigma Staff Assignment to RSAC

Needs Further Review

Please select the individuals or group that the application is being assigned.

Staff Assignment Electronic Signature*
Staff Assignment Date*

RSAC Reviewer #1

Review Required

Complete a review of the reviewer application and indicate whether the individual meets the requirements needed to act as a Sigma Abstract and/or Grant Reviewer.

Reviewer #1: Full Name*
Reviewer #1: This applicant does not meet all minimum requirements to be accepted; however, based on your review of their application, how would you rate them?*
Reviewer #1: I recommend that the applicant be:*
Note all comments could be shared with applicant. Your comments will be provided to applicants for constructive feedback and future improvements.
Reviewer #1: Electronic Signature*
Reviewer #1: Date*

RSAC Reviewer #2

Review Required

Complete a review of the reviewer application and indicate whether the individual meets the requirements needed to act as a Sigma Abstract and/or Grant Reviewer.

Reviewer #2: Full Name*
Reviewer #2: This applicant does not meet all minimum requirements to be accepted; however, based on your review of their application, how would you rate them?*
Reviewer #2: I recommend that the applicant be:*
Note all comments could be shared with applicant. Your comments will be provided to applicants for constructive feedback and future improvements.
Reviewer #2: Electronic Signature*
Reviewer #2: Date/Time*

RSAC Reviewer #3

Review Required

Complete a review of the reviewer application and indicate whether the individual meets the requirements needed to act as a Sigma Abstract and/or Grant Reviewer.

Reviewer #3: Full Name*
Reviewer #3: This applicant does not meet all minimum requirements to be accepted; however, based on your review of their application, how would you rate them?*
Reviewer #3: I recommend that the applicant be:*
Note all comments could be shared with applicant. Your comments will be provided to applicants for constructive feedback and future improvements.
Reviewer #3: Electronic Signature*
Reviewer #3: Date/Time*

ABSTRACTS FINAL REVIEW

Final decision regarding reviewer application that required additional review.

Abstract Final Review: The application has undergone further review and the decision made by the Research and Scholarship Advisory Council members is to:*
Abstract Final Review: Electronic Signature*
Abstract Final Review: Date*

GRANTS FINAL REVIEW

Final decision regarding reviewer application that required additional review.

Grants Final Review: The application has undergone further review and the decision made by the Research and Scholarship Advisory Council members is to:*
Grants Final Review: Electronic Signature*
Grants Final Review: Date*
Save and Resume Later
Form secured by Formstack
Form secured by Formstack